136 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 48 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Why is a "Rights Protection" Organization Coercing Conference Participants to Get Experimental mRNA Vaccines?

By       (Page 2 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments

jenny miller

And the fact that a Pfizer executive admitted to a member of the European Parliament that the Covid-19 vaccine was never even tested to see if it would stop transmission from one person to another?

Click Here

NARPA--Just rightwing propaganda. We trust the CDC to tell us how to keep our conferences safe. If we can't trust our government agencies whom can we trust?

Me--Did you know that the CDC is what is called a "captured agency"--meaning that they get a large percentage of their funding from vaccine patents and have other major financial conflicts of interest? Click Here

But even the CDC could only maintain the legitimacy of vaccine mandates and passports for so long. Last August the CDC issued a new policy that stated, because vaccination for Covid does not stop transmission, that the vaccinated and unvaccinated should not be treated differently. Click Here

As a result, in my state of California, all vaccine mandates for teachers were dropped. A few months later, all vaccination and mask requirements for frontline healthcare workers in California were dropped. Click Here

On May 1, 2023, the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services announced it will be ending vaccine mandates for the 17 million health workers covered by their vaccine mandate policy. Click Here

And in the latest news, all vaccine mandates for health workers in New York will now be eliminated. Click Here

If even the CDC and other governmental agencies are not supporting coercive and/or exclusionary vaccine policies, why is NARPA?

NARPA--Because it's based on our deeply-held beliefs. And, besides, we don't believe you.

Me--Why not?

NARPA--Because media people, and even articles on some of our favorite online sites, say that only rightwing nuts believe in the right to informed consent or refusal for vaccination during a pandemic. Make that recently-ended pandemic. Our vaccine policies are necessary to protect the greater good.

Me--Well, you say that the government agencies are always right and should not be questioned. Leaving aside the fact that the CDC no longer recommends that unvaccinated people be kept separated from, or treated differently from, those that are vaccinated, what about the government vaccine injury reporting agency, VAERS? The number of deaths from the Covid vaccine are now (as of May 25, 2023) listed at over 35,000 and the number of significant injuries at over one and a half million. https://openvaers.com/ But a Harvard-affiliated study found that only one percent of injuries or deaths ever get reported to VAERS. Click Here

So to get an accurate idea of the deaths and significant injuries, multiply those numbers by 100, meaning 3,500,000 deaths and 150,000,000 significant injuries.

What if people are so eager to come to the NARPA conferences to learn about patients' rights that they agree, against their better judgement and informed consent, to get the Covid shots, and then die or experience lifelong disability? Don't you feel any responsibility for coercing them to get shots that could result in lifelong injury or death?

NARPA--The science is settled. Covid vaccines save lives. All doctors agree. Only a small segment of the population, mostly Trump supporters, disagree.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 2   Valuable 2   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Jenny Miller Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Jenny Miller is a writer, activist, and freelance editor, living in California. Her articles have appeared in numerous publications, including Z Magazine, Utne Reader, Science for the People, and Terrain. Online her articles can be found at (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Chicken in Every Pot and a Cell Tower on Every Garage

Buyer Beware: An Historical Look at Bayer's Unethical Practices

Why is a "Rights Protection" Organization Coercing Conference Participants to Get Experimental mRNA Vaccines?

EMF Assault: Coming Soon to a Utility Pole Outside Your Home

#MeToo! Believing Survivors and Exposing Freud's Assault on Truth

The Answer to the Question: Why on Earth Would Anyone Vote for Bernie?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend