Me--There are 17,000 doctors and scientists who have signed a declaration saying that the Covid vaccines could be considered a crime against humanity. So not all doctors and scientists agree.
In the following article, a doctor and professor of bioethics explains in detail how the repressive Covid protocols, like vaccine mandates and lockdowns, violate the most basic principles of medical ethics.
NARPA--As we already said, these are conspiracy theorists. We trust the experts we listen to on TV every day.
Me--Your TV programs are funded by drug-company advertising, the same companies that are making inconceivably huge profits from trying to force vaccination on everyone. After Bill Gates cashed in the $20 million he made from investing in Covid vaccines, he recorded a video in which he said that the vaccines were not successful in stopping the spread of Covid and we needed some new technology. He thinks inhale-able vaccines are the next big thing (i.e. profitable investment). Click Here
Dr. Fauci after he retired wrote an article saying the Covid injections are not successful in stopping transmission. Click Here
NARPA--You are obviously being hoodwinked. And it would appear you have no concern about the health of others in our community.
Me--You claim to advocate for people's right to give informed consent or refusal to treatment. Yet human rights attorneys, such as those at Children's Health Defense, are arguing that vaccine mandates by educational institutions are a violation of the fundamental constitutional right to have control over our own bodies. They cite numerous court cases which have established the right to be free of coercion in decisions about medical treatment. Denial of educational opportunities, such as attending this patients' rights conference, is a form of coercion.
Additionally, these human rights attorneys point out, the only "FDA approved" COVID-19 vaccine is the Biontech "Comirnaty" vaccine, which is not available to anyone in the United States. Accordingly, all COVID-19 vaccine products are currently only available under emergency use authorization ("EUA"). Under federal law, all EUA products require informed consent and the right to refuse the product. See 21 U.S.C. Sec 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III).
NARPA--Our mission statement says we advocate for the right of people who have received psychiatric diagnoses to give informed consent or refusal to treatment. It doesn't say we advocate for everyone's right to give informed consent or refusal.
Me--Uh, ok, if that's how you understand the concept of human rights. But won't there be quite a few people who usually attend NARPA conferences who fit the category of having received a psychiatric label? Your policy will also ban those people who are unvaccinated, or can't/don't want to wear masks, from attending the conference.
NARPA--(Hands over ears) La, la, la, We can't hear you.
NARPA--We believe this conversation is over.
Me--No it's not over. There's also NARPA's forced masking policy. You claim to advocate for the rights of disabled people, but many disabled people cannot wear masks for medical reasons. There are a very large number of studies and meta studies showing that masks do not stop the spread of viruses. Even for people without lung or heart conditions that prevent the wearing of masks, the effects can be extremely harmful. Here is an example of one such study finding harm to health, including cognitive health, from wearing masks. Click Here
Wearing masks is harmful because exhalations contain toxins. That's how our bodies maintain balance. By wearing masks all day (and even into the night, if NARPA has evening events) everyone will be breathing in toxic exhalations continuously. But that's not the only problem with masks. Most also contain harmful ingredients. Click Here
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
2
2
1
