This compact has cemented the Neo-Con policy of support ever since. Mrs. Stetsko told the ABN to support Ronald Reagan's re-election. "The goal of the ABN ," she said, "is to pressure the U.S. government toward a "liberation' policy aimed against the USSR, with ABN leaders as the liberators. Although ABN members say they only need technical assistance from the West, they want the U.S. military to put them in power in Eastern Europe and the USSR. This is the formula they tried under German Nazi sponsorship."
Jumping to 1988, an article in the Jewish Weekly forced the resignation of six Republican leaders from George HW Bush's campaign, because of their Nazi ties. All of them were members of the Republican Heritage Groups Council.
In a May 1988 interview, Mrs. Stetsko was asked : "What do you hope your impact to be in the U. S. on the elections coming up this November?
Slava Stetsko: "Our people here are not electing a Democrat or a Republican. They are electing a man or woman who has some kind of integrity. They try to learn what ideas he or she represents and stands for. Men or women of great caliber and values we are giving our votes in the U .S. We consider that the U.S. needs great men, strong men, for the benefit not only of the U. S. but for all countries of the world. It is our interest to support good and strong people, and have them in Congress and in the government."
Slava Stetsko never had US citizenship. She was the leader of the ABN and OUN (b). These groups have been guiding Neo-Con politics this entire time.
How Does This All Tie Together, and How Does John McCain Fit in?To make the tie-ins complete, think about government along these lines;
Say you took 100 men that had never met or spoken together, and asked each of them to design the ultimate city--one with monuments, buildings, streets, etc. When they came together, there would inevitably be a lot of arguing, as their ideas would be different. That is Democracy. It is the marketplace of ideas.
On the other hand, if you gave those same 100 men all the same books on how to build the ultimate city, they would agree on a lot. They would have studied the same authors and ideas, and come to common terms on how to do it. That is what is going on in government right now.
Leo Strauss and the Chicago School (the University of Chicago), where our current President was a professor, don't care whether you're liberal or conservative, as long as you agree with certain principles. As a government employee, you would be expected, like each of the members of the second group of 100 city designers, to have arrived at the same conclusions as everyone else. That is US government today.
The National Review, a respected Neo-Conservative publication, makes the point this way: " Nazism may have been an ideology to which the United States was -- and to which the President is -- implacably opposed, but it is hardly "senseless.' By the early 1930s, the Nazi party had hundreds of thousands of devoted members and repeatedly attracted a third of the votes in German elections. Its political leaders campaigned on a platform comprising 25 non-senseless points, including the "unification of all Germans," a demand for "land and territory for the sustenance of our people," and an assertion that "no Jew can be a member of the race." Suffice it to say, many sensible Germans were persuaded."
The political theory of Strauss' Neo-Cons and the OUN (b) political wing came together to create the perfect storm in American politics. Both groups are Ultra Nationalist and able to work together hand-in-glove. Since the passing of the Patriot Act, the steady advance into ultra-nationalism in America has been unchecked.
Since the 1970s, when they proved their importance by delivering five states in a Presidential election, the ABN and its UCCA affiliate have been re-making the US government in their image. These same groups then made common cause with their sister Neo-Cons, and became kingmakers in American national politics. By the time of the Bush-Kerry election in 2004, it just didn't matter anymore which party won. Both were marching to the same drummer.
We have a Congress that votes according to Ultra-Nationalist thought. We have a strongman President who is now a law unto himself. Yet, even given the many times he has circumvented Congress and the Constitution, the really hard-core Nationalists in Congress are saying it's not enough.
The "survival of the fittest" aspects of Strauss and Eastern European Ultra Nationalism have changed the base on which America stands. Since 2001, the country has gone from tragedy to crisis, and each time new changes were made new wars were started. The 1% won and America lost.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
7
5
5
