2. Case studies
A series of simulated cases, or cases of other types of remarkable fraud and abuse in the US district court, US appeals courts, and the Supreme Court, is presented. The cases particularly focus on the unlawful deprivation of Liberty and fraud by financial institutions under the current financial crisis.
From top: NML Capital v Republic of Argentina, USDC NYSD (section C2k) : a) PACER docket entries , Dkt #1-5 - the summons was not docketed. b) Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Griesa, Dkt #5, is unsigned. As in all PACER cases, public access to the NEFs - authentication records - is denied. The case, which may cause the collapse of the Argentinian economy is opined fraud of medieval style and proportions.
Some of the most intriguing cases, where fraud upon the Court is documented in the submission, are:
a) Habeas Corpus actions of Richard Isaac Fine [xiii, xiv]
Former US prosecutor Richard I. Fine exposed and rebuked the taking by Los Angeles judges of "not permitted" payments, which were labeled by media "bribes". In the aftermath, a bill was passed and signed into law by then California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on February 20, 2009, providing "retroactive immunity", called by media "pardons" to all judges involved.
Two weeks later, on March 4, 2009, Richard Fine was arrested by the Warrant Detail of Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. Subsequently, Fine was held for 18 months in solitary confinement in the Los Angeles Twin Tower Jail.
The uniquely detailed documentation of the case provides evidence of the unlawful deprivation of liberty through coordinated operation of fraudulent electronic record systems in:
The California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles;
Sheriff's Department of the County of Los Angeles;
US District Court, Central District of California;
US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, and
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
