575 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/19/25

Remembering the Alliance for Progress and Soft Power

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments

Jason Sibert
Message Jason Sibert

Much has been written about the short presidency of John F Kennedy.

He was the first Catholic president, a reformer who advocated for the New Frontier, a good speaker, and a charismatic person. However, and less mentioned, is how he supported soft power, or non-military power in Latin America. JFK started a program called the Alliance for Progress. Relationships between the US and Latin America were bad in the early 1960's when he entered office. Remember, Latin America joined the Allies in World War II. These countries in the American hemisphere increased their production of vital raw materials and kept their prices low after the war, when the United States began massive aid programs for Europe and Japan. At the same time, Latin American nations told us that they deserved economic assistance.

The threat of Communism in Latin America was also on American policymakers' minds during the Cold War. In 1954, the Central Intelligence Agency funded and supplied a revolution that overthrew the leftist government of Guatemala. In 1959, Fidel Castro came to power in Cuba and by 1961, the US had severed relations with his government. In response to these developments, Kennedy pleaded for the Alliance for Progress. In requesting funds from Congress, the President stressed the need for improved literacy, land use, industrial productivity, health, and education in Latin America. The US needed to help Latin America, where "millions of men and women suffer the daily degradations of hunger and poverty" and "discontent is growing." The US would provide money, expertise, and technology to raise the standard of living for the people of Latin America, hopefully making the countries better able to resist communist influences. Congress voted for an initial grant of $500 million in May 1961. During the next 10 years, billions were spent on the Alliance, but its success was marginal and there were many reasons that the program was ultimately a failure.

Congressmen were reluctant to provide funds for land redistribution programs in Latin America because they felt it was socialism. Latin American elites directed most of the funds into pet projects that enriched themselves but did little to help most of their people. The Alliance indeed failed in its effort to bring democracy to Latin America. By the time the program faded away in the early 1970s, 13 governments in Latin America had been replaced by military rule.

Recently, our country has witnessed the Donald Trump Administration's attack on foreign aid. Early in his second term, Trump issued an executive order freezing most US foreign aid for 90 days, which has tumultuously disrupted programs that fight starvation and deadly diseases, run clinical trials, and seek to provide shelter for millions of displaced people across the globe. The US Agency for International Development is the central government organization that provides humanitarian aid, such as food, medical assistance, and disaster relief. The freeze has hit it the hardest.

Foreign aid is a form of power, called soft power in international relations. It's a way of projecting power that also shows the humanitarian side of the American people. In addition, it turns other countries away from the China/Russia orbit. The Trump Administration's stance on foreign aid is a gift to the totalitarian/authoritarian orbit. Why? China's Belt and Road Initiative is an investment in countries around the world. What if relations grow warmer between Latin America and China? What happens when China installs a military installation in the Western Hemisphere, Latin America? There will be a counterbalancing act and high military budgets for years. Anyone who looks at the federal budget understands that military spending dwarfs foreign aid. Our current Cold War will become even colder. We need to ask ourselves a question as Americans. What type of country do we want to be? Where do we want to spend our money? What type of power do we believe in?

Jason Sibert is the Lead Writer of the Peace Economy Project

Rate It | View Ratings

Jason Sibert Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Jason Sibert worked for the Suburban Journals in the St. Louis area as a staff writer for a decade. His work has been published in a variety of publications since then and he is currently the executive director of the Peace Economy Project.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Starting a New Discussion

Arms Control and New START

Escape from Authoritarianism

On Geoeconomics, International Law, and Peace

Negotiations in the Ukraine War

Our Government, Democracy and World Order

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEd News welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEd News rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters.
Become a Premium Member Would you like to be able to enter longer comments? You can enter 10,000 characters with Leader Membership. Simply sign up for your Premium Membership and you can say much more. Plus you'll be able to do a lot more, too.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password
Show Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

No comments  Post Comment

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Tell A Friend