193 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 68 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Where are we on 9/11?

By       (Page 25 of 45 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments

Charlie Delgado
Message Charlie Delgado
9/11 was an inside job.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdbEVXLgr7s&mode=related&search= "9/11 and the Media: Why the Facts Are Supressed" (Audio file):
by Professor John McMurtry

http://www.archive.org/download/johnmcmurtry1/johnmcmurtry1.mp3

McMURTRY: WHY THE FACTS OF 9-11 ARE SUPPRESSED
(Understanding the ruling group-mind behind the war without end):

In response to the extreme pressures of forcing reality to conform to manufactured delusions
, the group and its members become increasingly submerged within a pre-conscious field of hysteria, denials and projections. In the case of 9-11 and the 9-11 Wars, the shadow subject of the ruling group-mind and its executive vector propelled two war criminal invasions of other societies and police-state laws across the world in under three years. Insight into the ruling group-mind is reflected by David Rockefeller at a Bilderberg session in 1991: A supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries. Their program is being played out in Iraq against heroic resistance, while elsewhere in the empire the regulating group-mind (what Julian Jaynes calls the collective cognitive imperative; and Leon Festinger, in his manual on cognitive dissonance, calls cognition.) demands complicity with its fundamental assumptions, e.g. that 9-11 was an attack from the outside and that the Earth and its creatures are not sacred.

--Intl. Citizens Inquiry into 9-11, Toronto, May 30, 2004. (51 min.)
Two truths became immediately self-evident to the astute observer on September 11, 2001.

First, it was a physical impossibility for the Twin Towers to collapse in a free-fall "pancaking" manner without having a controlled demolition. Second, it was a logistical impossibility in terms of military Standard Operating Procedures for two commercial airplanes to crash into the Twin Towers UNLESS Standard Operating Procedures were not followed by the United States military, the Federal Aviation Administration and the airlines themselves. To put it simply, there were security checks and procedures in place with the FAA, the Air Force, The Stategic Air Command, NATO, NORAD, Combat Air Patrol, and ALL COMMERCIAL AIRLINES that prevented this very type of thing from taking place.

Hijackings were nothing new.

The concepts of loss prevention, risk avoidance, and emergency procedures in the event of a hijacking in the continental United Sttates were all well-established at the time.


NUMBER ONE. The Physical Impossibility of 9/11

The following is true for ALL buildings, regardless of the construction and regardless of the materials used in the bulding structure.

A building will not "pancake" unless there is a controlled demolition creating an implosion (an inward collapse) of a building. A controlled demolition consists of several timed explosions strategically placed, timed, and detonated at various locations of a building structure, at varying degrees of force, calculated to redistribute the weight of a collapsing building such that the building falls straight down, into itself, rather than outward, or away from its "footprint."

The buildings did not simply collapse --they completely disappeared.

The buildings would not have completely disappeared in the way that they did simply as a result of being struck by airplanes.

After the inmpact of an airplane collision, the buildings would have remained standing.

After the impact of an airplane collision, the buildings would have remained standing as mere shells or skeletons of what they were before impact --similar to the bombed out buildings of World War II after being bombed by incendiary bombs. I would refer the reader to the opening scene of the movie Judgement at Nuremberg for reference, an MGM classic, copyright 1961, starring Spencer Tracy, Richard Widmark, Burt Lancaster, Judy Garland, Marlene Dietrich, Maximilian Schell, and Montgomery Clift. The notion that the buildings would have simply disappeared because they were struck by airplanes defies both common sense and the laws of physics. It is also sheer fantasy.


If a controlled demolition does not take place when an airlplane collides with a building, several things will happen.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22  |  23  |  24  |  25  |  26  |  27  |  28  |  29  |  30  |  31  |  32  |  33  |  34  |  35  |  36  |  37  |  38  |  39  |  40  |  41  |  42  |  43  |  44  |  45

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Charlie Delgado Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Independent researcher and writer
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend